Image
Biochar

The Promise and Pitfalls of Negative Carbon Emissions – A Regional Case Study of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed

Photo by Oregon Department of Forestry

The 2015 United Nations Paris Agreement on Climate Change laid out a narrow path for limiting the world’s warming to 2ºC. That path includes the deployment of carbon negative technologies that effectively run climate change in reverse. These technologies have obvious appeal and buy time to transition our energy systems away from fossil fuels. But it is not immediately obvious that any of the proposed technologies could ever be deployed at the necessary scales given the alignment of economic, environmental, and engineering factors that would be needed. In this project, an interdisciplinary team with expertise in these three domains will develop a regional model to assess the potential impact, trade offs, and costs of negative carbon emissions on the Chesapeake Bay region.

Understanding how regional decision making is likely to play out is important because if the conditions that would enable these technologies to flourish is unlikely to exist, alternatives will need to be developed as soon as possible. This research represents the first regional assessment of carbon negative technologies using the Chesapeake Bay watershed as a case study. The Chesapeake Bay contains much of the agricultural land in the mid-Atlantic US as well as major urban areas (including the nation’s capital), coastal infrastructure, agricultural activity, and carbon storage sites. The model enables us to quantify the absolute contribution negative emissions technologies could have on global climate cycling in light of the biophysical, economic, and logistical constraints so that we can help set realistic expectations and goals.

Want more information on this research?


Outcomes from this Project

Publications

Global satellite observed daily vertical migrations of ocean animals
From zero to hero?: Why integrated assessment modeling of negative emissions technologies is hard and how we can do better
Food, Energy, and Water Implications of Large-Scale Negative Emissions with and without Direct Air Capture
Life Cycle Meta-Analysis of Carbon Capture Pathways in Power Plants: Implications for Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage

Media Mention

Some Plans to Reverse Climate Change Could Double Water Use

Project Team

Image
Andres
Clarens
EI Associate Director; Professor
University of Virginia
Image
Scott Doney
Scott
Doney
Professor
University of Virginia
Image
Bill
Shobe
Professor Emeritus
University of Virginia
Image
mountain lake
Image

Related News and Projects

Initiatives

All initiatives
Image
solar land

Related News and Projects

Image
rotunda

Related News and Projects